Showing posts with label Criterion 11. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Criterion 11. Show all posts

Saturday, March 25, 2017

Feedback

Feedback to Brigitta Nieuwboer  Across Kāhui Ako teacher applicant.               


The evidence presented and described to support this appointment process lead us to conclude that you model effective practice in your own school and that you meet the criteria for the Across Community of Learners Teacher Role.

The competency based interview and panel members’ examination of supporting documentation demonstrated an effective teacher who even with significant teaching responsibility has led collaborative inquiries in senior mathematics, moderation of OTJs and changing science teaching  and your documents showed evidence of developing practice from learning and discussion. 

Your challenge is now to work responsively with Col leader and colleagues across your Kāhui Ako collaboratively developing capabilities and identifying and addressing problems of professional practice to improve teaching and the learning outcomes for diverse student in your Community.

This will require working with the Community leaders to focus efforts on meeting the Community shared achievement challenges.

As you pointed out in your interview, you lead reflective professional learning with your team, you understand what a powerful tool collaboration can be, that you are capable of changing your thinking and practice when different models are introduced and you make significant effort to ensure a culturally inclusive approach to children’s learning. Your experience and success with current science teaching means you have much to offer as you work collaboratively with others in the Kāhui Ako.

Finally, congratulations on meeting the national eligibility criteria and I wish you every success for the challenges ahead. I am sure you will make a great contribution to the Kāhui Ako.



Prue Kelly
Independent Adviser
New Appointments National Panel
25 February 2017

Monday, February 13, 2017

Mindlab

I am part of the November 2016 intake and complete this post graduate study on the 11th of July. I have found this study to be beneficial for my teaching as I can relate everything I learn to what is happening in my classroom. I enjoy doing the assessments with my two colleagues as this enables me to discuss learning and takes the pressure off having to do everything myself, especially when working full time as well.

The last 16 weeks will be different as we no longer go to the classes and have to do things ourselves. It has been a little difficult and the readings and tasks are easily forgotten - the weeks just fly by. We have the last big assessment done and have one more we do together, after that I do the last two by myself. This works out fine as I will be at my new school so won't have as easy access for meetings.

Monday, May 23, 2016

Mathematics Inquiry

Collaborative team inquiry, 2016

Question –
Will our in-depth knowledge of the maths progressions help to accelerate the progress of the at risk students when working in mixed ability groups?



Specific Goal: By the end of 2016, I am going to know the maths progressions so that I am able to quickly identify the levels the students are working at, and therefore, be able to move students on to the next level more efficiently.



  • Research and gather maths progressions that adequately cover all the stands, are clearly outlines, and give examples.
  • Make a folder/bound book of progressions that can be used when planning.
  • Collaboratively work on building knowledge of progressions to help with anticipating student responses and know what they should be doing next.
  • Set up are on RTC to record inquiry.
  • Set regular times to add to RTC.

May 24th

Maths Inquiry - entries on blogs, reflections, what is working across teams, what do we still need to improve, share ideas and resources.
  1. Collect progressions in all areas.
  2. Check our own understanding of each progressions.
  3. Best way to teach each progressions.
  4. Use multiple types of equipment. Eg, use pictures of people, cars etc to get children to visualise what the question is asking. Bring resources and student progress to the next meeting to share - does the maths talk improve with use of specific equipment? We will add to our blogs.
  5. Look at the wording of the old gloss - create a problem around stage 6 - make equipment to use with it.

Team discussed using visual aids to help our at risk students. We want to see if using these aids will increase the probability that students will understand the problem.

June 9th
Shared ideas and created a shared folder with visual aids.

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

Registered Teacher Criteria


Registered Teacher Criteria
Criteria
How does the criteria link with the evidence?
Evidence
1. Establish and maintain effective professional relationships focused on the learning and well-being of all akonga.  
·      My focus is on building a safe environment for teachers to develop their science skills

Leadership Course in Dunedin
 2. Demonstrate commitment to promoting the well-being of all akonga. 
·      Leadership plan for 2016 has student outcomes as top priority
STLP (Science Teaching Leadership Programme)
 3. Demonstrate commitment to bicultural partnership in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Science in relation to the land and culture of NZ Working with scientists
 4. Demonstrate commitment to ongoing professional learning and development of personal professional practice.
By engaging in this programme, I am committed to my own ongoing learning of science, and skills in leadership.
·      STLP (Science Teaching Leadership Programme)
5. Show leadership that contributes to effective teaching and learning.
The leadership course will identify the skills that I need to work on, which in turn will make me a more effective leader.
·      Attending the leadership course in Dunedin.
·      Communicating with management to implement phase 2 of the STLP
·      Working with Paul from JPC to enhance science between the two schools.
6. Conceptualise, plan and implement an appropriate learning programme.
I have developed a science development programme for teachers that will allow them to learn and engage with science in achievable chunks. Teachers will the have confidence to teach their classes.
STLP (Science Teaching Leadership Programme)
7. Promote a collaborative, inclusive and supportive learning environment.
This is both for teachers and students.
Tasks will be organised so that teachers have to work collaboratively. This same ethos will then be able to be used with students.
STLP (Science Teaching Leadership Programme)
8. Demonstrate in practice their knowledge and understanding of how akonga learn.
Discussions about the best way students learn.
Networking with other teachers at other schools.
Using the combined knowledge of STLP participants and facilitators.
Curriculum Days in Wellington and Auckland.
STLP (Science Teaching Leadership Programme)
9. Respond effectively to the diverse language and cultural experiences, and the varied strengths, interests and needs of individuals and groups of akonga.
I am wanting children to see me as a learner. I want to allow children an easy way to follow my journey as they showed an interest in what I was going to do whilst I am away from school.
·      Set up blog so that children can see what I am learning.
10. Work effectively within the bicultural context of Aotearoa New Zealand.
11. Analyse and appropriately use assessment information, which has been gathered formally and informally.
We have researched student outcomes in science and have identified that there is a need to improve in this area – hence my being on the STLP programme.
STLP (Science Teaching Leadership Programme)
12. Use critical inquiry and problem-solving effectively in their professional practice.
I am continually using research of effective practices, observing others, working alongside scientists, attending curriculum and leadership days, and networking with others to reflect on my own practices both in the classroom and as a leader.
·      STLP – ongoing inquiry into my own practice (classroom and leadership)
·      Readings – research into effective practice

Sunday, April 26, 2015

Science Teaching Leadership Programme 2015/2016



30.7.15


Science Blog: 

http://stlpscience.blogspot.co.nz/


School newsletter 29.4.15

We received the exciting news last week that Brigit Nieuwboer (Room 1) has been offered a place on the newly developed Science Teaching Leadership Programme.
‘This newly developed Programme supports the Government’s strategic direction for Science and Society by providing opportunities for teachers of science for years 1 – 10 to develop leadership skills and enhance the teaching of science within school communities’
Brigit will be on leave during Term 3 and 4. A Science teacher from JPC has also been offered a position on this prestigious programme, so JPC and St Mary’s will be working together, to improve Junior Science learning within the two communities.
I am sure you will join me in congratulating Brigit on this fantastic opportunity that has been offered to her and I know the school will gain much from Brigit being on this Leadership Programme.

Science Teaching Leadership Programme 2015/2016


Inbox
x

Jenn Corbitt Jenn.Corbitt@royalsociety.org.nz

22 Apr (5 days ago)
to wim.nmeprincipalJohn
Hi Brigit and David

The selection process for the Science Teaching Leadership Programme (STLP) has been completed.  As a result, the Royal Society of New Zealand is very pleased to offer your school and nominated teacher a place on the Science Teaching Leadership Programme beginning term 3 and 4 2015. 

As you are aware, there are two phases to the Programme – a placement for the nominated teacher in a science organization for terms 3 and 4 2015, following by 12 – 18 months science development in your school during 2016 and early 2017.

A copy of the letter of offer will be sent to the school and nominated teacher this week.   Please find attached a generic copy of this letter for your information.

Before you make the decision as to whether you accept this offer or not, can you please reread the attached STLP guidelines so you are clear about the Programme’s objectives and the professional and personal commitment you are making.  
Below you will find a return form.  Please fill out and return as soon as you can once you have made your decision. 

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Jenn or I at the Royal Society of New Zealand (“the Society”)


Kind regards
Jenn Corbitt


RSNZ Contact details for the Science Teaching Leadership Programme
Jenn Corbitt DDI: 04 470 5751 E:  Jenn.Corbitt@royalsociety.org.nz
John Auty DDI: 04 470 5763 E:  John.Auty@royalsociety.org.nz

Return Form:  Please complete and forward this by email to John Auty atjohn.auty@royalsociety.org.nz.  DDI 04 470 5763
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

I, the nominated teacher, accept/decline a place on the Science Teaching Leadership Programme and I understand and accept the terms and conditions.

Name of nominated teacher
Best contact phone number
Best email address

I, the Principal or HOD Science, accept/decline  a place on the Science Teaching Leadership Programme and I understand and accept the terms of conditions.

Name of school:
Name of Principal or HOD Science




Jenn Corbitt Project Manager - Teacher Fellowship /Science Teaching Leadership Programmes
DDI: +64 4 470 5751
11 Turnbull Street, Thorndon | PO Box 598, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
www.royalsociety.org.nz

Royal Society of New Zealand | Te Apārangi
A place for knowledge and excellence

Saturday, May 24, 2014

Teacher Inquiry

8.11.14
A final SAST spelling test has been completed last week. Looking back from the beginning of the year, all students have improved. At the beginning of the year, only one student was spelling at 15.5 years. Now, 10 students have reached that level and above.

9.9.14
A second 100 word test will be completed at the end of the term.
We need to find a better way of showing results.

Next Steps:
Term 4, week 6, we will test spelling with the Peter's Test in line with the rest of the school. We will not complete a new 100 word test in Term 4 as there are too many other demands on the students' time. We have a number of other assessments in which we can test spelling. At this stage, we hope to see spelling results improve in the context of writing across the curriculum. We will also be expect to see the improved spelling results in the writing e-asTTle in November.

To try a new approach to get the children to understand the words and spell them correctly, I wrote the 25 homework words in their group modelling books, and children had to individually make up a story using all the words. I heard children asking others what words meant - as they could not use the word unless they knew what it meant. There was a lot of laughter when the stories were being written and when they were read out.

Results:
We can compare e-asTTle spelling (writing) from the beginning of the year and the end. Use the writing marking rubric to highlight shifts in spelling results and children can clearly see how their spelling has improved over the year.
Beginning and end of year Peter's test results will show gains in spelling ages.

Term 3
I have assessed the whole class on the new 'Mastery' spelling placement tests, placed them into groups A to E, and have made up modelling books for each group.

Students have been also tested on 100 words made up from words A-E. Their score have been recorded as a beginning score, and they will be retested on the same words at the end of the term. Each group now works on learning words within their groups. Every week, each group is given 20 new words from their lists to learn as well. During the week, I give the class a quick 10 word spelling test made up of words from all groups. This is repeated every day with the results being that nearly every student gets 10 out of 10 by the end of the week. This also extends the lower ability spellers by adding more challenging words.

With so much emphasis on spelling, I am expecting to see a huge improvement in writing as well.

PLG Spelling   29.7.14

Brigit and Sheryl

Result are improving – even in the last writing sample taken in Term 2. We are going to make up another 100 word list as this adds an element of competition and it gives children an end point to work towards.

We did an extra Peters spelling test at the end of last term and the results were stunning. All children improved considerably except for one who was away a lot last term and missed many lessons.

I did another placement test yesterday 28.7.14, to see if children needed to be moved. There is no A group anymore (lowest) and only 2 in B group. A number moved groups.

The writing results – spelling part – should improve by the end of the year. This shows that children are using spelling in context and can use the rules correctly.


I have created spelling books for each group to use so I will try to see if these books help each group. I haven’t used spelling worksheets which do go with the programme as they seems very prescriptive. I might try another source.