Showing posts with label Criterion 5. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Criterion 5. Show all posts
Sunday, April 23, 2017
Science Cluster Workshop
I attended the science cluster workshop in the last week of term 1 2017. It was the first time all the primary schools had come together to share ideas. There were only two schools who actually had ideas to share and those were mainly around working with scientists in the community, which I think is a bit too much for teachers who are just starting out. Some of the teachers looked quite stunned at what we were presenting so I hope they realise that we have been doing this for some time, plus we both had been involved in the STLP which helps as well. I won't get an opportunity to go to one of these meetings again with this cluster as I am moving schools. It has been both rewarding and frustrating working within a cluster that has just been set up. The school that I am going to is also part of a cluster so it will be interesting to see how that works as it has been going to a number of years.
Saturday, March 25, 2017
Feedback
Feedback to Brigitta Nieuwboer Across Kāhui Ako teacher applicant.
The evidence presented and described to support this appointment process lead us to conclude that you model effective practice in your own school and that you meet the criteria for the Across Community of Learners Teacher Role.
The competency based interview and panel members’ examination of supporting documentation demonstrated an effective teacher who even with significant teaching responsibility has led collaborative inquiries in senior mathematics, moderation of OTJs and changing science teaching and your documents showed evidence of developing practice from learning and discussion.
Your challenge is now to work responsively with Col leader and colleagues across your Kāhui Ako collaboratively developing capabilities and identifying and addressing problems of professional practice to improve teaching and the learning outcomes for diverse student in your Community.
This will require working with the Community leaders to focus efforts on meeting the Community shared achievement challenges.
As you pointed out in your interview, you lead reflective professional learning with your team, you understand what a powerful tool collaboration can be, that you are capable of changing your thinking and practice when different models are introduced and you make significant effort to ensure a culturally inclusive approach to children’s learning. Your experience and success with current science teaching means you have much to offer as you work collaboratively with others in the Kāhui Ako.
Finally, congratulations on meeting the national eligibility criteria and I wish you every success for the challenges ahead. I am sure you will make a great contribution to the Kāhui Ako.
Prue Kelly
Independent Adviser
New Appointments National Panel
25 February 2017
Monday, February 13, 2017
Mindlab
I am part of the November 2016 intake and complete this post graduate study on the 11th of July. I have found this study to be beneficial for my teaching as I can relate everything I learn to what is happening in my classroom. I enjoy doing the assessments with my two colleagues as this enables me to discuss learning and takes the pressure off having to do everything myself, especially when working full time as well.
The last 16 weeks will be different as we no longer go to the classes and have to do things ourselves. It has been a little difficult and the readings and tasks are easily forgotten - the weeks just fly by. We have the last big assessment done and have one more we do together, after that I do the last two by myself. This works out fine as I will be at my new school so won't have as easy access for meetings.
The last 16 weeks will be different as we no longer go to the classes and have to do things ourselves. It has been a little difficult and the readings and tasks are easily forgotten - the weeks just fly by. We have the last big assessment done and have one more we do together, after that I do the last two by myself. This works out fine as I will be at my new school so won't have as easy access for meetings.
Monday, May 23, 2016
Mathematics Inquiry
Collaborative team inquiry, 2016
Specific Goal: By the end of 2016, I am going to know the maths progressions so that I am able to quickly identify the levels the students are working at, and therefore, be able to move students on to the next level more efficiently.
Question –
Will our in-depth knowledge of the maths progressions help to accelerate the progress of the at risk students when working in mixed ability groups?
Specific Goal: By the end of 2016, I am going to know the maths progressions so that I am able to quickly identify the levels the students are working at, and therefore, be able to move students on to the next level more efficiently.
- Research and gather maths progressions that adequately cover all the stands, are clearly outlines, and give examples.
- Make a folder/bound book of progressions that can be used when planning.
- Collaboratively work on building knowledge of progressions to help with anticipating student responses and know what they should be doing next.
- Set up are on RTC to record inquiry.
- Set regular times to add to RTC.
May 24th
Maths Inquiry - entries on blogs, reflections, what is working across teams, what do we still need to improve, share ideas and resources.
- Collect progressions in all areas.
- Check our own understanding of each progressions.
- Best way to teach each progressions.
- Use multiple types of equipment. Eg, use pictures of people, cars etc to get children to visualise what the question is asking. Bring resources and student progress to the next meeting to share - does the maths talk improve with use of specific equipment? We will add to our blogs.
- Look at the wording of the old gloss - create a problem around stage 6 - make equipment to use with it.
Team discussed using visual aids to help our at risk students. We want to see if using these aids will increase the probability that students will understand the problem.
June 9th
Shared ideas and created a shared folder with visual aids.
Labels:
Criterion 1,
Criterion 10,
Criterion 11,
Criterion 12,
Criterion 2,
Criterion 3,
Criterion 4,
Criterion 5,
Criterion 6,
Criterion 7,
Criterion 8,
Criterion 9
Wednesday, July 29, 2015
Registered Teacher Criteria
Registered Teacher Criteria
Criteria
|
How
does the criteria link with the evidence?
|
Evidence
|
1. Establish and maintain effective professional
relationships focused on the learning and well-being of all akonga.
|
· My focus is
on building a safe environment for teachers to develop their science skills
|
Leadership Course in Dunedin
|
2. Demonstrate commitment to
promoting the well-being of all akonga.
|
· Leadership
plan for 2016 has student outcomes as top priority
|
STLP (Science Teaching Leadership Programme)
|
3. Demonstrate commitment to
bicultural partnership in Aotearoa New Zealand.
|
Science in relation to the land and culture of NZ | Working with scientists |
4. Demonstrate commitment to
ongoing professional learning and development of personal professional
practice.
|
By engaging in this programme, I am committed to my
own ongoing learning of science, and skills in leadership.
|
· STLP (Science Teaching Leadership Programme)
|
5. Show leadership that contributes to effective
teaching and learning.
|
The leadership course will identify the skills that
I need to work on, which in turn will make me a more effective leader.
|
· Attending the leadership course in Dunedin.
· Communicating with management to implement phase 2 of the STLP
· Working with Paul from JPC to enhance science between the two schools.
|
6. Conceptualise, plan and implement an appropriate
learning programme.
|
I have developed a science development programme for
teachers that will allow them to learn and engage with science in achievable
chunks. Teachers will the have confidence to teach their classes.
|
STLP (Science Teaching Leadership Programme)
|
7. Promote a collaborative, inclusive and supportive
learning environment.
|
This is both for teachers and students.
Tasks will be organised so that teachers have to
work collaboratively. This same ethos will then be able to be used with
students.
|
STLP (Science Teaching Leadership Programme)
|
8. Demonstrate in practice their knowledge and
understanding of how akonga learn.
|
Discussions about the best way students learn.
Networking with other teachers at other schools.
Using the combined knowledge of STLP participants
and facilitators.
Curriculum Days in Wellington and Auckland.
|
STLP (Science Teaching Leadership Programme)
|
9. Respond effectively to the diverse language and
cultural experiences, and the varied strengths, interests and needs of
individuals and groups of akonga.
|
I am wanting children to see me as a learner. I want
to allow children an easy way to follow my journey as they showed an interest
in what I was going to do whilst I am away from school.
|
· Set up blog so that children can see what I am learning.
|
10. Work effectively within the bicultural context
of Aotearoa New Zealand.
|
||
11. Analyse and appropriately use assessment
information, which has been gathered formally and informally.
|
We have researched student outcomes in science and
have identified that there is a need to improve in this area – hence my being
on the STLP programme.
|
STLP (Science Teaching Leadership Programme)
|
12. Use critical inquiry and
problem-solving effectively in their professional practice.
|
I am continually using research of
effective practices, observing others, working alongside scientists,
attending curriculum and leadership days, and networking with others to
reflect on my own practices both in the classroom and as a leader.
|
· STLP
– ongoing inquiry into my own practice (classroom and leadership)
· Readings
– research into effective practice
|
Labels:
Criterion 1,
Criterion 10,
Criterion 11,
Criterion 12,
Criterion 2,
Criterion 3,
Criterion 4,
Criterion 5,
Criterion 6,
Criterion 7,
Criterion 8,
Criterion 9
Sunday, April 26, 2015
Science Teaching Leadership Programme 2015/2016
30.7.15
Science Blog:
http://stlpscience.blogspot.co.nz/School newsletter 29.4.15
We received the exciting news last week that Brigit Nieuwboer (Room 1) has been offered a place on the newly developed Science Teaching Leadership Programme.
‘This newly developed Programme supports the Government’s strategic direction for Science and Society by providing opportunities for teachers of science for years 1 – 10 to develop leadership skills and enhance the teaching of science within school communities’
Brigit will be on leave during Term 3 and 4. A Science teacher from JPC has also been offered a position on this prestigious programme, so JPC and St Mary’s will be working together, to improve Junior Science learning within the two communities.
I am sure you will join me in congratulating Brigit on this fantastic opportunity that has been offered to her and I know the school will gain much from Brigit being on this Leadership Programme.
Science Teaching Leadership Programme 2015/2016
Inbox
| x |
|
22 Apr (5 days ago)
![]() | ![]() ![]() | ||
| ||||
Hi Brigit and David
The selection process for the Science Teaching Leadership Programme (STLP) has been completed. As a result, the Royal Society of New Zealand is very pleased to offer your school and nominated teacher a place on the Science Teaching Leadership Programme beginning term 3 and 4 2015.
As you are aware, there are two phases to the Programme – a placement for the nominated teacher in a science organization for terms 3 and 4 2015, following by 12 – 18 months science development in your school during 2016 and early 2017.
A copy of the letter of offer will be sent to the school and nominated teacher this week. Please find attached a generic copy of this letter for your information.
Before you make the decision as to whether you accept this offer or not, can you please reread the attached STLP guidelines so you are clear about the Programme’s objectives and the professional and personal commitment you are making.
Below you will find a return form. Please fill out and return as soon as you can once you have made your decision.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Jenn or I at the Royal Society of New Zealand (“the Society”)
Kind regards
Jenn Corbitt
RSNZ Contact details for the Science Teaching Leadership Programme
Jenn Corbitt DDI: 04 470 5751 E: Jenn.Corbitt@royalsociety.org. nz
John Auty DDI: 04 470 5763 E: John.Auty@royalsociety.org.nz
Return Form: Please complete and forward this by email to John Auty atjohn.auty@royalsociety.org.nz. DDI 04 470 5763
______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ ________
I, the nominated teacher, accept/decline a place on the Science Teaching Leadership Programme and I understand and accept the terms and conditions.
Name of nominated teacher
Best contact phone number
Best email address
I, the Principal or HOD Science, accept/decline a place on the Science Teaching Leadership Programme and I understand and accept the terms of conditions.
Name of school:
Name of Principal or HOD Science
Jenn Corbitt Project Manager - Teacher Fellowship /Science Teaching Leadership Programmes
DDI: +64 4 470 5751
11 Turnbull Street, Thorndon | PO Box 598, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
www.royalsociety.org.nz
DDI: +64 4 470 5751
11 Turnbull Street, Thorndon | PO Box 598, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
www.royalsociety.org.nz
Royal Society of New Zealand | Te Apārangi
A place for knowledge and excellence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Labels:
Criterion 1,
Criterion 10,
Criterion 11,
Criterion 12,
Criterion 2,
Criterion 3,
Criterion 4,
Criterion 5,
Criterion 6,
Criterion 7,
Criterion 8,
Criterion 9
Thursday, March 27, 2014
Student Led Conferences
In our staff meeting today we looked at how one school, Bucklands Beach Intermediate, runs student led conferences.
Learning Intention for today – to introduce the concept of student led conferences as an extension of our reporting system and implications for our classroom programmes.
In groups we looked at the reading re Buckland’s Beach nd discussed the main points of what a student led conference looks like. We talked about how we can ensure parents understand that these conferences are not interviews but are a chance for their child to talk about what they can do and where they are going to go next with their learning. The focus of a student led conference is on the child and celebrating their learning.
Reference made to Hattie and his findings re the importance of developing students ability to discuss their learning ( ie What I learned, how I learned it and what my next steps are)
There are many ways to scaffold children to enable them to discuss their learning; eAsstle, graphs, rubrics, cue cards.
The challenge now is to ensure that we prepare our staff, our students and our parents for our first round of student led conferences. We looked at what we already do and some of the things we need to do.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
